WAS HILLARY CLINTON’S LOSS BASED ON SEXISM?

, , , , ,
June 06th, 2008

Personally, I don’t think so.

Barack Obama ran a much more organized campaign and had a clearer message about change throughout the campaign.

Hillary changed from month to month and we didn’t see the “right” Hillary until the past couple of months.

And for her, it was too little too late.

What do you think?

Related: Hillary Clinton Covers

NY Post Hillary Exit Cover

Newsweek’s Flattering Cover - A rare one

Time’s Fighter Cover

The Week Running on Empty

The Republic Republic Inside Her Head

Time’s Love Her/Hate Her Cover

NY Post Toast Cover

The Week’s Toast Cover

VIllage Voice’s Bruising Cover

Share: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • YahooMyWeb

Susan 06 Jun 2008 / 5:12 pm

Hillary’s campaign had flaws in it. The people who ran it made many mistakes. Obama was better organized especially in the caucas states. Hillary was the more experienced candidate. Both Obama and Hillary improved as the campaign progressed. Hillary should be the Vice Presidential candidate.

Michael 06 Jun 2008 / 5:13 pm

The media hurt Hillary. They blew up the Bosnia story way out of proportion.

Betty 06 Jun 2008 / 5:15 pm

Hillary did grow as a candidate. Why didn’t she run a better campaign? Hillary had been through 2 presidential campaigns. Why didn’t she have better people leading the campaign?

You must log in to post a comment.







Register | Lost your password?


RSS Feed










Blogroll


Fan sites